<<"And you never asked about the—place with the door?" said Mr. Utterson.
"No, sir: I had a delicacy," was the reply.
“I feel very
strongly about putting questions; it partakes too much of the style of the day
of judgement. You start a question, and it's like starting a stone. You sit
quietly on the top of a hill; and away the stone goes, starting others; and
presently some bland old bird (the last you would have thought of) is knocked
on the head in his own back garden, and the family have to change their name.
No, sir, I make it a rule of mine: the more it looks like Queer Street, the
less I ask.”
"A very good rule, too," said the lawyer. >>
--Robert Louis Stevenson, The Strange Case of Doctor Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
The blog post below is a reprise from November 20, 2014 titled "Clarence Thomas, Bill Cosby, and the Absence of Memory". In light of the publication of New York Magazine's cover story depicting thirty-five women who have accused Bill Cosby of sexual assault, I thought it was a particularly apt time for re-sharing this piece. Since my publication of the November 20, 2014 post, it seems that the chickens have come home to Cosby's house to roost. Or, at least, they are in the barnyard scratching at the gate: there has been more evidence supporting the allegations against Cosby. The women in the New York Magazine piece, rendered in black and white, are both black and white, but mostly white. This racial tableau, curiously to some, has thus far been suppressed as part of the larger narrative of outrage. I don't know that it is so curious. Bill Cosby was one of those Famously Transcendent Black People: he was racial in a non-racial (non-threatening) way.
While the specter of black males as sexual predators has long been a potent trope in the United Statesean pysche, there is a parallel and perhaps even more powerful trope of the sexless, subservient black Uncle who could be trusted with white women and children as well as the family jewels and secrets. Bill Cosby as Heathcliff Huxtable was the black Uncle in spades (pun intended). Did anyone ever wonder at Heathcliff Huxtable's profession as an obstetrician? A master of the helping profession, his amiable, avuncular manner reassured America that all was well in the post-Civil Rights era, all while racial turmoil continued to bubble beneath the surface.
Bill Cosby's alleged numerous predations were made possible by a persistent, willful social and legal blindness, forgetfulness, and an almost criminal incuriosity. These behaviors were adopted in order to sustain the black Uncle trope. Dr. Huxtable as Mr. Hyde is a jarring disruption to a myth that many hold dear.
_____
The allegations regarding Bill Cosby have proved
very timely for recent discussions in my Race and Law class, as we just
completed a unit on the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings and the
allegations of Anita Hill. I was somewhat surprised that some students had
apparently never heard of the sexual harassment allegations against Justice
Thomas.
I was completely flabbergasted, however, at the
fact that some students, including some women, thought that even if Justice
Thomas had done and said the things that were alleged, they did not constitute
sexual harassment and/or did not have anything to do with his fitness to serve
on our highest court. Some women opined that this was "just how some men
are" in the workplace, and women needed to deal with it or get out.
I don't think that this bodes well for us as a
society. And not because I consider the students’ comments blameworthy. I
myself have been in situations involving sexual harassment of epic proportions,
and my thoughts ran much the same way at the time. For instance, at my
law firm summer job following my first year in law school, I was treated to
remarks so vile and behaviors so obscene that I have never fully recounted them
to anyone. When it became clear that this kind of behavior was pervasive in the
firm, I agonized about what to do. Should I tell someone? Tell who, I thought.
Some of the name partners were the worst offenders. Should I quit? I
dismissed that possibility immediately. Though I had very good
credentials, finding a firm job after first year summer had been like grabbing
the brass ring, especially when so many of my classmates of color had not
gotten such a job.
In addition, I did not wish to quit or address
the harassment head-on because the money at my job was very, very good.
It was more than I had earned in my life up to that point. It was more
than my parents earned. And, as a poor kid, I needed that money. I more
than needed that money. I wanted that money and the things that it could buy.
There are pictures of me from that period of my life wearing one of my new
Nordstroms business suits, standing next to my new car, holding my new briefcase, smiling broadly. It was a cynical
inversion of a g-money cash fanning photo, except instead of selling drugs I
was selling cool, college educated, black upwardly mobile yearnings. Not
unlike those shown on the Cosby Show, which, not coincidentally, was a
staple of my law school viewing. So, I soldiered on in the malign conditions of
sexual harassment at my job. When, at the end of the summer, I was
offered part-time work during the school year, I accepted it. I reasoned
that it made no sense to pass up such high wages.
Finally, a few months afterward when I could take
it no more, I walked purposefully into the hiring partner’s office and told
him…that I needed to quit in order to insure that my grades remained high.
We looked each other in the eye, and I knew that he knew the real problem.
We shook hands warmly, and he gave me an excellent reference that sent me on
the way to the rest of my career. Did I miss an opportunity to fight against
women’s oppression? Maybe. Were the hiring partner and I complicit in
maintaining the hideous atmosphere, with my excellent reference being the price
of my silence (never mind that I had outworked every associate in the place)?
Again, maybe. But more likely is the case that my relatively low status at the
firm would have meant that my complaints would fall on deaf ears. Also
more likely is the case that I would have been blackballed from other
employment in the immediate future. So it went, and so it goes.
As I wrote in a
piece in the Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law and Justice reviewing a recent
book by Anita Hill, Hill’s testimony at the Clarence Thomas confirmation
hearings “both engendered and gendered a national conversation on sexual
harassment in the workplace and demonstrated how such harassment had the
potential to oppress and demean even relatively privileged women.” However,
that testimony, and its aftermath, quickly became a part of what film theorists
call the “space-off”: spaces not visible within a camera’s frame that may only
be inferred from represented (main frame) spaces in the center of the camera's
eye. Space-off material is sometimes even erased or subsumed in the represented
space by cinematic rules of narrative. And from the space-off of so many years
ago, Hill’s testimony, much like the allegations of rape by Cosby’s accusers,
has traveled even farther, seemingly falling into the void of absent memory.
The absence of memory regarding allegations
against Justice Thomas and Bill Cosby, and the ways in which
the allegations have been addressed when they are remembered, speaks to
how much work still needs to be done to secure the rights of women in the
workplace and elsewhere.
No comments:
Post a Comment